negative functions of English as global language Although there are many positive features of having a global language, there arefunctions negative as well. As it would be possible to achieve a global language? Is there of the dangers with having a global language? A global language could cultivate a class dell’elite with the natives, taking advantage of the opportunity to think quickly and work in their native language. If this were the case could handling them to their advantage at the expense of those who have other language as their mother tongue and in this way creates a language gap between the people. English has a story, sometimes cruel and violent with colonialism and war and to introduce English as the global language could be seen as a threat of future dominance. Perhaps a global language will make little people willing or unable to learn other languages and to make other languages unnecessary. One of the œ of risksof the of which only one language is the language that choice may become in beta and very technical œ of the impoverishedof for non-native speakers, such as Eskimos, who have several words for snow, because they need. Probably could not express themselves properly if they had only one word for snow. And the Swedish people could not use the of lagomof œ of the speaking, a word that says a lot about society and the Swedish people. Many people who responded to my question about the English œ of the as global of Languageâ, expressed a concern that if we had only one language, would have considered the poorof the œ of the when is to express sensitivity and emotions in a language that is not their mother tongue, which does not know enough words to really express how power and what they consider. “of samples that the sample should be used? Samples stringent or relaxed? English is the mother tongue of millions of people in different parts of the world. If the British were to become a global language, that the level of language would have been the overall champion? Perhaps the samples become more relaxed. English standard is English that is usually used in print. It is also the English which is normally taught at school and non-native speakers learning English. this is also the champion who has been talk among people educated and is used for notiziarii television. Historically, the British sample was developed by the southeast of England(the area around London). These dialects were spoken in court, used in the law and the government. The standard English grammar has a widely accepted and an accent that comes with this sample, the accent of British English, also known as the Oxford of Englishof œ of the, is the accent that is taught is schools. This English still has important cultural influence, particularly on languages in the previous Commonwealth countries, for example South Africa, Australia and India so as the European Union. southern œ of the of American-Englishof the œ of the hear often that – African – of Englishor other The of the Englishesof œ of the of, but no such term really exists. The different types of English to English are based British but have developed differences in vocabulary and grammar because of the of loanwordsof œ of the and influence from other languages. Languages and secondary crops What will happen to crops and secondary languages if we introduce a global language? An introduction of a global language could lead to distinguish from other languages. The loss of language equals the identity loser. The language is much more than just a tool for communication. According to Trudgill there is an intimate relationship between language and culture and a great homogenization of culture could lead to a change in the language where indigenous people adopt a different language and finally the old language can die out. There is a difference between the of deathlanguage œ of the and of the murderlanguage œ of the. The death of language is when a language disappears naturally; its speakers are leaving voluntarily, but the murderof language œ of the means that the language dell’assassino actively discourages the use of other languages. The minority languages can be removed by the media and education systems. English refers to as the languagedell’assassino of œ of the, so that means it’s a subtractive learned dominant language, the cost of maternal languages, rather than cumulative. In the U.S. there have been some movements of the British of Onlyof œ of the, the first of 1803, when they forbidden to speak French among the population in Louisiana. After that, several attempts to remove Spanish and French have done. English is declared as the official language in several conditions in the United States. The movements English only were rejected by linguistic; mean that a language does not generate political unity, it will take more than that. The use of a single language in a community is a guarantee for social harmony and mutual understanding. This has been demonstrated several times throughout history, for example American Civil War, Spanish Civil War and former Yugoslavia. Conclusion This paper has indicated that the creation of a global language presents many advantages and disadvantages. Clarity mutual, the great career prospects and administrative costs ridutrici are some of the benefits that a global language give. The disadvantages are that English is linked very closely with British and cultures and history director and is therefore not a language of the neutralof œ of the. Maybe a language with connections less historical and cultural would be a better option? We are in need an international language for communication, politics, trade and security, but at the same time we are concerned about the death of language, the indigenous have advantages and all non-native speakers of the handicaps face. English is developing, it lle harsh words and its future looks bright. My opinion is that if there is ever an international language, English is the best option. It is a strong, well-developed language with millions of speakers. Even if a global language could be important, different languages are of importance for their crop and for the development of their indigenous. Languages make the world more interesting and more alive. A lingua-franca can be any language that is used for communication between the people who did not the mother tongue in common. In many former European colonies in Africa, French or English is used as the language of communication in trade and commerce. In some parts of Africa, other African lingua-franca, such as Swahili and Hausa, are used. These languages are indigenous in some countries and have been used because of political reasons. When a language is used as a lingua-franca, undergoes a certain amount of reduction and simplification. The simplification refers often to get rid of irregularities and grammatical gender in the language-franca. This happens because adults are generally different children, students of languages not good and therefore needs a simplified version of the language.
